Practice makes perfect – but how much is enough?

Deliberate practice is often talked about in hours, but this article looks at why the number and quality of practice events may matter more. It compares the 10,000-hour rule with research suggesting many people improve through repeated application, often around seven deliberate practice events. From there, it shows what this means for learning, coaching and skills development: mastery needs practice in real or realistic situations, not just reminders, refreshers or content.

Not many would argue with the value of practice

But how much is enough?

The 10,000 hour rule

The technique of deliberate practice was published in a paper in 1993. In 2008, Malcolm Gladwell published his book, Outliers, and his idea that it required 10,000 hours of practice to become an expert in anything swept the world.

10,000 hours roughly translates to about 10 years of practice. For most of us, this is a big number – too big! You may think, I don’t have that much time. But also, maybe I don’t need to be the world’s best expert in something either.

What if you just want to get better?

So let’s forget about being an expert. How much practice does it take to be just really good at something?

Josh Kaufman researched this exact question, and he came up with 20 hours. Now, that’s a pretty big gap between 10,000 and 20, and let’s be honest, both are still a decent time investment.

In the first blog in this series, we explored whether all practice is created equal, and what makes practice effective. That leads us to the next question: what is the minimum amount of practice someone can do to get better at a skill?

What research tells us

A 2020 study by Ken Koedinger from Carnegie Mellon University found that it took somewhere between 3.6 and 13.3 applications or practice events to get to 80% level of correctness.

Interestingly, the research also showed that the rate at which students learnt the material was the same. The difference between whether a student took 3.6 or 13 practice sessions was down to their previous level of knowledge and expertise in the topic.

On average, it took 7 deliberate practice events for most people to reach 80% level of correctness.

What this means for skills development

This has really interesting implications for us in learning.

Firstly, we know that sending out reminders of content, refresher videos etc. really don’t have much impact on mastery. We know that mastery requires application, and according to this new research, on average, about 7 practice events.

So it seems that it’s less about how many hours you spend doing practice and more about the number of deliberate practice or application events.

The practical takeaway is simple:

  • Mastery requires application, not just reminders or refresher content.
  • Most people need multiple deliberate practice events to build confidence and accuracy.
  • The number of quality practice events may matter more than total hours spent practising.
  • Starting knowledge affects how many repetitions someone needs.

What this looks like in practice

So what would that look like in the real world of training?

Let’s say that coaches were trying to master the coaching behaviour of trying to talk less and ask more questions in their coaching sessions. And they selected 2-3 types of open questions that could easily lead to follow-up questions.

This research says, depending on your starting point, that you would need to practice it 4-13 times in either real or role play-type scenarios. After which you could be assessed and would likely achieve an ‘A’.

Making deliberate practice visible

That may not necessarily take that much time, certainly not 10,000 hours.

The question then becomes, how many organisational learning and development teams are set up to assess and measure up to 13 separate practice events?

This is where YakTrak can help. It gives leaders a clearer way to set practice goals, follow up on coaching and see whether skills are being applied in real work.

There is much work still to do for organisations to re-skill, upskill and reach new levels of people capability and performance. But it does help us look at skill-building practice differently.

Forget about measuring on the time you put in and concentrate instead on the number of quality deliberate practice events you complete. Then think about how you make this happen for the people you lead and coach.

Want to make deliberate practice easier to track?

Explore how YakTrak helps leaders turn learning into repeated, observable practice with clear goals, follow-up and evidence of application.

Ready to Start Your Pathway?

Ready to move from ideas to results? Pick a quick demo to see workflows, 
or a discovery call to discuss your challenges. We’ll tailor the pathway.